Page 8 - 北京京煤集团总医院第十届·2022学术年会论文集

北京京煤集团总医院 第十届·2022 学术年会论文集

suspected gastrointestinal perforation, and extreme systemic failure; (3) Those who refuse

endoscopy; (4) Mentally abnormal and unable to cooperate; (5) Those who proposed transnasal

[5]
gastroscopy; (6) Those who proposed Sedative and analgesic gastroscopy .
Table 1 Comparison of general conditions between the two groups

Groups
Items T P
A group B group

Age 50.5±12.52 51.23±10.26 0.25 0.805
BMI 24.05±1.02 23.78±0.95 0.38 0.709

1.2 Research methods

1.2.1 Routine preparations

Explained to the subjects the purpose of the examination, the matters that need to be cooperated,

and the related risks and complications that might occur during and after the examination; signed

the informed consent. All subjects were forbidden to eat or drink for more than 8 hours before the

examination.

1.2.2 Operation method

Subjects took 10ml of Dyclonine hydrochloride mucilage (Yangtze River Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.,

10ml:0.1g) 10 minutes before gastroscopy, anesthetized the throat and oral cavity for 3 to 5 minutes

and swallowed it. After that, subjects took the left lateral decubitus position and was connected with

the multifunctional monitor. Subjects in group A adopted nasal breathing mode during the whole
process of gastroscopy (see figure 1), and gastroscopy was performed after their breathing was

stable. The subjects in group B adopted the mode of nasal inspiration and oral expiration throughout

the examination (see figure 2), and the rest were the same as that in group A.

- 3 -