Page 10 - 北京京煤集团总医院第十届·2022学术年会论文集

北京京煤集团总医院 第十届·2022 学术年会论文集

operation (that is, when the endoscope passes through the gastroesophageal junction) and after the

end of the examination. Observe and record the adverse reactions of the two groups during

gastroscopy, including nausea, cough, belching, restlessness, etc. The subjects were given a VAS
score immediately after the endoscopy, that is, a visual analog scale score that reflected the subject's

[6]
personal feelings (method: use a 10 cm ruler as a scale plate: "0" means no pain, " 10" indicates
extremely severe pain. The higher the score, the more severe the pain), and the differences in VAS

scores between the two groups were accounted for and compared (see figure 3).

Fig 3 visual analogue scale (VAS)

1.4 Statistical analysis

SPSS 26 software was used for statistical analysis. Measurement data were expressed as mean ±

standard ( x  s )deviation, t-test was used, enumeration data were expressed by case (%), χ2 tests

were used, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

2 Results

2.1 Comparison of vital signs between the two groups of subjects before, during and after

examination

Before examination, HR, MAP and SPO2 values of the two groups were not statistically significant

(P>0.05). During the examination, that is, when the endoscope passed through the

gastroesophageal junction, the MAP and HR values of the two groups were increased, and the

difference between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05). There was no

meaningful change in SPO2 between the two groups, and the difference was not statistically

significant (P>0.05). After the examination, the MAP and HR of subjects basically recovered to

the levels before the examination, and there was no noteworthy change in SPO2, and the difference

was not statistically significant (P>0.05). See Table 2.

- 5 -