Page 7 - 北京京煤集团总医院第十届·2022学术年会论文集
P. 7

北京京煤集团总医院                                              第十届·2022 学术年会论文集


                                                                                                 [3]
                   analgesic and sedative gastroscopy limited its widespread development in primary hospitals  .
                   The application of sedatives and analgesics can effectively narrow the discomfort during

                   gastroscopy. However, the inhibitory effect of narcotic drugs on the cardiovascular system can
                   result in hypotension and even coma. Some subjects have adverse reactions such as nausea and


                   vomiting after examination. Some scholars have found that many subjects did not choose sedative
                                                                                      [4]
                   and analgesic gastroscopy for the fear of adverse reactions related to anesthesia  , so there is still
                   a high objective demand for non-analgesic and sedative gastroscopy in the examined population.

                   This study observed and compared the application effects of nasal breathing and nasal inspiration

                   and oral expiration in non-analgesic sedative gastroscopy, and discussed the safety, tolerance and

                   comfort of the two breathing methods.



                   1 Materials and methods

                   1.1 General information

                   This prospective cohort study was performed at the Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center, Beijing

                   Jingmei Group General Hospital. The study was endorsed by the Ethics Committee of Beijing

                   Jingmei Group General Hospital (No. 2020KY018-01) and informed consent was obtained from all
                   patients.  A  total  of  60  subjects  who  underwent  non-analgesic  and  sedative  gastroscopy  in  the


                   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Center of Beijing Jingmei Group General Hospital from January 2021
                   to  June  2021  were  selected  as  the  research  subjects.  The  subjects  were  divided  into  2  groups

                   according to their wishes: the nasal breathing group (group A, n=30) and the nasal inhalation and

                   mouth expiration group (group B, n=30). There were 28 males and 32 females, aged 18 to 78 years

                   old, with an average of 50.87 years old, and body mass index (BMI) of 17.69 to 32.46. The P values

                   of the two groups in terms of age and BMI were all greater than 0.05, and the difference was not

                   statistically  significant  (see  Table  1).    Inclusion  criteria:  (1)  Those  who  with  smooth  nasal

                   breathing;  (2)  Those  who  with  no  contraindications  for  gastroscopy;  (3)  Those  who  informed

                   consent  and  voluntary  participation  in  the  study.  Exclusion  criteria:  (1)  Those  who  with

                   nasopharynx  or  oropharyngeal  airway  obstruction;  (2)Those  who  have  contraindications  to

                   gastroscopy,  such  as  serious  cardiovascular  diseases  accompanied  by  cardiac  insufficiency  or

                   serious coronary heart disease, descending aortic aneurysm, serious lung diseases, serious oral or

                   throat  diseases,  endoscopy  failure,  acute  tonsillitis,  acute  pharyngitis,  corrosive  esophagitis,

                                                           - 2 -
   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12