Page 70 - 北京京煤集团总医院第十一届·2023学术年会论文集

北京京煤集团总医院 第十一届·2023 学术年会论文集

Table 1 Basic characteristics of the literature on risk factors for DPPB.

Sample Gender Age
Researcher Year Nation Study Type NOS
size(n) Male Female Bleeding No Bleeding
Group Group
Yoshikazu Inagaki 2021 Japan case‒control 295 186 109 72.6±8.3 68.6±9.6 7
Xianyi Lin 2019 China case‒control 3962 2186 1776 51±16 54±10 6
Peipei Li 2019 China case‒control 287 199 88 56±14 58±12 6
Zhe Luo 2019 China case‒control 922 598 324 56.6±12.3 58.8±10.8 6

Changqin Liu 2019 China case‒control 709 468 241 62.71±11.237 61.00±9.376 7
Peng Cheng 2018 China case‒control 459 225 234 60.30±10.66 58.16±11.03 7

Soo Kyung Park 2018 Korea Prospective 3887 2661 1226 52.4±12.3 55.8±11.9 7
Cohort study
Bum Su Choung 2014 Korea case‒control 3788 2248 1540 60.21±11.11 58.67±11.40 7
Hee Seok Moon 2014 Korea case‒control 368 318 50 60.08±13.36 60.62±12.27 6

Qiang Zhang 2014 China case‒control 5600 3944 1656 47±16 53±14 7
Jeong Ho Kim 2013 Korea case‒control 210 155 55 58.0±11.2 57.7±11.2 8

Xianrui Wu 2013 America Prospective 120 62 58 69.9±9.2 64.9±12.2 6
cohort study
K. Tim Buddingh 2011 Netherlands case‒control 156 73 80 66±12 61±12 8
M.S. Sawhney 2008 America case‒control 173 169 4 64.3±16.7 65.4±10.5 7

Hirotsugu Watabe 2006 Japan case‒control 3138 2578 560 61.4±7.3 62.4±10.1 6
NOS: Newcastle Ottawa scale.
3.3. Literature quality evaluation

A total of 6 studies scored 6 stars [6, 13-17] , 7 studies scored 7 stars [3, 7, 8, 18-21] , and 2 studies scored 8
stars [22, 23] (see Table 1).
3.4. Meta-analysis results
3.4.1. The incidence of DPPB

Thirteen studies [3, 6-8, 13-20, 22] have examined the incidence of DPPS (i.e., the number of DPPB
2
cases/total number of cases), with I =98%. The random effects model was used for pooled analysis,
and the incidence of DPPB was 0.02, 95% CI (0.01–0.03). Among the included studies, the highest

incidence of DPPB was 0.06, 95% CI (0.05–0.08), while the lowest incidence of DPPB was 0.00,
95% CI (0.00–0.00) (see Fig. 2).

- 66 -